|
Rabbi Joel Lehrfield
|
| The Rabbi's Study |
| November, 2002 |
Every so often, I come across an article that I feel should be shared with the members of the Congregation. This is so, when the article in question points to a critical theme that marks the life of our people. These weeks in the Congregation, we are reading of the founders of our people and their encounter with Hashem. Foremost among them was Avraham. Avraham was known as Avraham Havri". The word Ivri has multiple meanings. Literally, it means "for the other side". This may refer to the fact that Avraham came from the other side of the river. It may also refer to the fact the whole world viewed things in one way and Avraham was the lone, single opponent to this view. It was he who proclaimed the power of Hashem over heaven and earth and all its creatures, as opposed to a plethora of deities, each of whom divided nature and life into their own sphere of influence. Thus, Avraham stood on one side and the world stood on the other, and sometimes the world is wrong. |
"The whole world is demanding that Israel withdraw. I don't think the whole world, including the friends of the Israeli people and government, can be wrong." -Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary General, speaking in Madrid, Spain |
| "At this moment in time, many Jews
who love and support Israel hear the soft voice within, asking the question
to which Kofi Annan recently alluded in Madrid: Can we alone be right, while
the whole world around is wrong?" |
The evidence that we are standing on the other side of the "whole world" is manifest. The Arab League is untied in condemnation and Egyptian students march for an end to their country's diplomatic relations with Israel that were engraved at Camp David. The United Nations Security Council roundly condemns Israel several times in mere weeks, and its human rights commission again takes up the Durban chant against Zionism that was silenced by September 11. The European Union is rife with talk of boycotting the Jewish state. Synagogue attacks in France give vent to the feeling expressed with gentility by the French diplomat who termed Israel "that sh-y little state." All three major political parties in Germany vie to lead their nation in condemning Israel. England accuses Israel of using British-made tanks illegally. Mobs attack Jews from Ukraine to Belgium to the Netherlands. The Pope condemns Israel for its military presence outside the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, while armed Arab terrorists repose inside, holding monks and nuns as icons for terror. |
| We Jews are bemused. Are
we the only ones who see the unrelenting suicide bombings of women and children
at pizza stores, of teenagers at a discotheque, of families at a Seder celebration?
After 19 months of slaughter at open-air fruit markets and bus stations
and Bar Mitzvah parties, deadly shootings of motorists, stabbings of school
children in caves, has no one seen this but us? Do we alone notice that
the attacks target Jewish and Arab civilians alike throughout pre-June 1967
Israel, from Haifa to Hadera, West Jerusalem to Beersheba? |
| The whole world demands
Israel take risks for peace with Yasser Arafat - again. Are we the only
ones who perceive that, after he was conferred a Nobel Peace Prize and given
authority to create a new polity and a new atmosphere for coexistence, he
desecrated the next eight years by wielding television to inculcate grotesque
images of murder, radio to disseminate a culture of hate schools and summer
camps to train young people to murder the Jews they were being taught to
hate? Can no one but us decipher the receipts he signed authorizing funds
to purchase weapons of terror? |
| The whole world endorses
President Bush's call for war against terrorists and those who harbor them.
The United States invades Afghanistan to uproot the infrastructure of terror
and hunkers down there for seven months, preparing to extend the incursion
into Pakistan. Aerial bombs strafe cities. Thousands of civilian non-combatants
are believed dead. The Taliban government crumbles, but the incursion continues.
We must find Osama bin Laden. We must find Mullah Omar. We must reach Daniel
Pearl's killers. And we yet shall begin the mother of all incursions into
Iraq. |
| We Jews see this. We also
see the same "whole world" roundly condemn Israel for its incursion
into a jungle of terror. Israel will not drop incendiary payloads from the
air on civilians, so Israeli reservists, husbands and fathers, die in house-to-house
fighting in Jenin, where the terrorists booby-trap buildings, station snipers
and outfit children as human bombs. Israel asks that Arafat turn over the
assassins of an Israeli cabinet minister and the mastermind of the Karine-A
affair that tried to smuggle 50 tons of explosives to the minions. But the
whole world wants Israel instead to pull back while the bombers of Hamas,
Islamic Jihad, the Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade and the Tanzim play for time.
Doesn't the whole world see what we see? Can we alone be right? |
| Well, yes. If we Jews
are anything, we are a people of history. From our first patriarch to Israel's
precision-targeted destruction of the Iraqi nuclear reactor in 1981 which
laid the foundation for a successful Operation Desert Storm and the rescue
of Kuwait, our history provides the strength to know that we can be right
and the whole world wrong. |
| We have confronted the
question many times. The whole world was polytheistic, and we alone preached
belief in one G-d. We preached a Day of Rest, and the whole ancient world
mocked us as a lazy people. We were right, and the whole world was wrong.
They said we crucified a Jew - as if the Romans would have allowed any of
its subjects to do such a thing, as if Jews ever had such a punishment in
our code - and we insisted such a thing was beyond impossible. We were right,
and the whole world was wrong. In the Middle Ages, the whole world said
that we use children's blood to make matzo; we denied it. They said that
we poisoned the wells of Europe, and we denied it. We were right and the
whole world was wrong. The Crusades. The blood libels and Talmud burnings
in England and France, leading those nations to expel Jews for centuries.
The Spanish and Portuguese Inquisition. The ghettoes and the Mortara case
in Italy. Dreyfus in France. Beilis in Russia and a century's persecution
of Soviet Jewry. The Holocaust. Kurt Waldheim in Austria. Each time, Europe
stood by silently - or actively participated in murdering us - and we alone
were right, and the whole world was wrong. |
| Today, once again, we
alone are right and the whole world in wrong. The Arabs, the Russians, the
Africans, the Vatican proffer their aggregated insights into and accumulated
knowledge of ethics of massacre. And the Europeans. Although we appreciate
a half-century of West European democracy more than we appreciated the prior
millennia of European brutality we recognize who they are, what they have
done and what's what. We know, if they don't, that they need Arab oil more
than they need Jewish philosophy and creativity. We remember that the food
they eat is grown from soil fertilized by 2,000 years of Jewish blood they
have sprinkled onto it. Atavistic Jew-hatred lingers in the air into which
the ashes rose from the crematoria. Finally, the best of Europe truly are
wracked by the burdened conscience of what they their parents and their
bubbes and zeides did, or failed to do, in the 1940's. So, instead of confronting
a shameful past that belies their self-vaunted romantic civilization, they
seek now to assuage their consciences with the mendacity that Israel 2002
is no different from Europe 1942. |
|
Yes, once again, we are right and the whole world is wrong. It doesn't change a thing, but after 25 centuries, it's nice to know. The article Off The Press, reprinted from the April 19, 2002 edition of The Forward is found as an insert. Rabbi Dov Fischer, an attorney, is a board member of the Los Angeles Jewish Federation-Council's Jewish Community Relations Committee and National Vice-President of the Zionist Organization of America. He is the author of "General Sharon's War Against Time Magazine."
|
|
|